3 ms·
Except for problems known as "embarassingly parallel", we often have trouble running even quite boring algorithms on 32 or 64 cores. In general setting 64 peopl
by CJefferson 7y ago
Except for problems known as "embarassingly parallel", we often have trouble running even quite boring algorithms on 32 or 64 cores. In general setting 64 people in a job won't lead to a better or faster result than 2 or 3.
Given that, I don't see an immediate reason to believe throwing multiple AIs at a problem is going to exponentially scale either, given neither people nor bad AIs scale that way.