15 ms·
It isn't the access to the service that is evil. Rather, that you get a lesser service on a different platform unless you pay. Consumers expect the same experi
by shakna 7y ago
It isn't the access to the service that is evil.
Rather, that you get a lesser service on a different platform unless you pay. Consumers expect the same experience regardless of platform. When that experience is free on some platforms but paid on another, it frustrates.
- rusk 7y agoability to use on different platforms = a feature
- TeMPOraL 7y agoFeature or bug, that's ultimately up for the market to decide.
- rusk 7y agoPretty sure the market has adjudicated on YouTube at this stage LOL
- chownie 7y agoIt's weird to me to call this a feature, a few years ago it was a given. YouTube had to go out of their way to break playback on mobile to offer this "feature". I consider it a bug they've added purposefully and they request each user pay for.
- rusk 7y agoIt demands that engineeting resources are set aside and costed i each case. Both for implemtation and maintenance. It is definitely a feature whether youd been getting it for free up to now or not