> predict the probabilities Yeah that's all I needed to read to know that this is BS. On a more serious note, if charities are indeed funding terrorism, you w

> predict the probabilities Yeah that's all I needed to read to know that this is BS. On a more serious note, if charities are indeed funding terrorism, you wouldn't have data on them. Especially in Pakistan where keeping data is something only the reputable orgs do. This "paper" is not peer-reviewed and it will never get published. Just a usual case of a smartass thinking they can justify that their correlation means something when in fact it doesn't.