If the cost is the same as nuclear, it should be preferred, as there is no nuclear waste. And that's probably even also considering that both the actual cost o

If the cost is the same as nuclear, it should be preferred, as there is no nuclear waste. And that's probably even also considering that both the actual cost of nuclear[0][1][2][3], as well as the risk of failure[4][5] and the therein resulting costs[6] are often wildly underestimated. [0]: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4631737.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4631737.stm [1]: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2019/01/31/debunking-the-low-cost-nuclear-myth/ https://www.pv-magazine.com/2019/01/31/debunking-the-low-cos... [2]: https://financialtribune.com/articles/energy/9386/nuclear-decommissioning-cost-underestimated https://financialtribune.com/articles/energy/9386/nuclear-de... [3]: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/true-cost-of-nuclear-power-1.3415825 https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/true-cost-of-nucl... [4]: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4543400/Scientists-warn-nuclear-regulators-underestimate-risk.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4543400/Scie... [5]: https://phys.org/news/2017-05-nuclear-greatly-underestimate-potential-disaster.html https://phys.org/news/2017-05-nuclear-greatly-underestimate-... [6]: https://cleantechnica.com/2019/04/16/fukushimas-final-costs-will-approach-one-trillion-dollars-just-for-nuclear-disaster/ https://cleantechnica.com/2019/04/16/fukushimas-final-costs-...