3 ms·
> I see comments like this all the time, but it doesn't happen that fast. You won't notice a big difference in your lifetime, and neither will your children I
by realusername 7y ago
> I see comments like this all the time, but it doesn't happen that fast. You won't notice a big difference in your lifetime, and neither will your children
I do already, the weather is much worse than when I was a kid, much drier and the heat waves are harsher.
- Mikeb85 7y agoAnd it's -10 degrees C with half a foot of snow where I live at this exact moment, does that cancel out your anecdote?
- defterGoose 7y agoNo. No it really doesn't.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- aplummer 7y agoThat’s actually a confirming anecdote FYI, the occurrence of more extreme weather events in both directions
- occam65 7y agoIf that's unusual for you, it actually helps prove his point...
- LeoPanthera 7y agoI think perhaps you ought to realize how childish the "it's cold outside so global warming is a myth" argument sounds. It makes you sound willfully ignorant, which I'm sure isn't what you intended.
- Mikeb85 7y agoI literally responded to a thread where someone said the world would end in 25 years, someone had a more measured response, then someone used the warm weather where they live as proof of impending disaster. Think about what I responded to.
- realusername 7y agoI'm not talking about current weather but climate in general, your answer is missing the point.
- Enginerrrd 7y agoNo it's not, but it's completely symmetric to the anecdote they were replying to, which was in fact the point. We've got 6 replies so far saying mikeb85's comment is silly, but only one saying that the comment he was replying to was silly, by EXACTLY the same arguments.
- hailk 7y agoIt's quite evident that it's agenda based rationalisation. It's fine as long as we're spreading misinformation or framing data in a manner that furthers what we think the world should do. Rest of the type of misinformation and framing are dumb and pernicious of-course and need to be vilified.
- dTal 7y agoIt's not symmetric at all! Describing the current weather is not at all the same as describing an observed long-term trend, with associated ecological disruption.
- throwaheyy 7y agoYou’re confusing “weather” with “climate”, that’s a rookie mistake
- c0nducktr 7y agoYou're smarter than this, Mike.
- eloff 7y agoThat's a small difference.
- realusername 7y agoNot really, there's already big parts of the forest dying because of that and it's very visible from the outside.