It sounds like you are more familiar with her beliefs and this subject material than me. Would you mind elaborating on your disagreements? Personally, I don't

It sounds like you are more familiar with her beliefs and this subject material than me. Would you mind elaborating on your disagreements? Personally, I don't think any measurement is non-model-dependent. It's a question of which model. You need a model to turn some physical phenomenon into bits in memory and yet another model to interpret these bits. I am also not convinced tired light is any more falsifiable than any other cosmology. I'm sure all it's problems could be rectified by adding enough terms that depend on variables we cannot ever measure. A version of it may be falsified, but there could always be another version with dark-whatever that explains any deviation. I feel this is just another way of expressing dismissal by non-adherence to consensus.