4 ms·
Thanks for the explanation, makes sense. I was tempted to classify this as "irrelevant to me", but then I remembered an application I had recently where I had v
by billforsternz 7y ago
Thanks for the explanation, makes sense. I was tempted to classify this as "irrelevant to me", but then I remembered an application I had recently where I had values (chess games) that I was sorting which I didn't want to reorder if they were adjacent (as far as the sort was concerned) but not identical. Ended up adding an "original order" field as a sort tiebreaker. As it happens a stable sort would have saved me the pain.