> What I won't stand for is lying about that software's status as open source. He may not be an expert on licensing but he's had it explained to him by experts

> What I won't stand for is lying about that software's status as open source. He may not be an expert on licensing but he's had it explained to him by experts and chooses to continue lying. That's not acceptable behavior. How do you know this? What makes you assume that following the poll he won’t change the wording? Maybe even the license? Why do you still accuse him of lying? Maybe it’s just an honest mistake? In dubio pro reo, right? > It's even worse to see projects like this misleading contributors into giving to a project which isn't even open source in the first place and asks for more than it gives. I disagree. We need to be respectful in the way we interact with each other. Proper social intercourse is more important than the the topics we discuss. I think everyone sees and respects how you feel about free / open source licensing. Why can’t you just be a little bit more respectful towards the choices and opinions of others?