3 ms·

I think that's just your own personal bias on the matter – 99%, really? To me (IMO), Git is something that's inherently visual and not really suited to a CLI, i

I think that's just your own personal bias on the matter – 99%, really? To me (IMO), Git is something that's inherently visual and not really suited to a CLI, it has nothing to do with not understanding how Git works under the hood.

Florin_Andrei 7y ago
> Git is something that's inherently visual It absolutely is. The whole "branch" paradigm evokes topology. The visual structure of the thing you're working with ought to be made clear to you, the user. If a GUI has trouble when the workflow deviates from normalcy, it's just not powerful enough. That being said, there will always be users who prefer the command line, and that's totally fine.
- Myrmornis 7y ago
  Although git supports it, one doesn't normally need to use complex branch tree topologies that require visualization.