3 ms·
>he should be ruthlessly mocked 100% agree. I too, think science needs way more flame wars and shit posting. The current discourse is far too tame and civil.
by akyu 7y ago
>he should be ruthlessly mocked
100% agree. I too, think science needs way more flame wars and shit posting. The current discourse is far too tame and civil.
Who else should we gang up on?
- kryogen1c 7y ago> >he should be ruthlessly mocked > 100% agree. I too, think science needs The GP is pointing out its not science. Seems a reasonably flame worthy target.
- akyu 7y ago"I disagree with someone. Therefore they are deserving of ruthless mocking and flaming." sips can of monster Noice...
- kryogen1c 7y ago> "I disagree with someone. Therefore they are deserving of ruthless mocking and flaming." Youre moving the goalposts. We're not talking about disagreeing with some in a debate, but a public figure disseminating incorrect info masquerading as science. Monster is bad for you.