3 ms·
Not quite the true experience. It should first start with writing the program on a standard coding form (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FortranCodingFo
by Merrill 7y ago
Not quite the true experience. It should first start with writing the program on a standard coding form (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FortranCodingForm.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FortranCodingForm.pn...), after which it is sent to the keypunch department. When the deck and card listing come back the next day, the programmer would proofread the listing and use a Type 029 to replace misspunched cards and insert/delete to correct bugs found in re-reading. This was somewhat laborious, since most programmers did not type well, and unlike the simulation, the 029 did not have a backspace key. JCL or other control language cards as needed by the operating system would have to be punched to define memory needed, tape drives, disk drives, department chargeback accounts, etc. And the output would come back after a few hours on 132 column greenbar fanfold.
- masswerk 7y agoThe input text-area should be styled as the respective COBOL and FORTRAN coding forms. With a bit of luck, if the browser doesn't interfere, the text should also line up with the column index. You are free to just retype and exchange individual cards – for a lengthy program, it's probably the most convenient option. There's also a bit of greeenbar (though not too green and the non-US type) in the reader output (and it's planned for the output of the FORTRAN runtime.)