3 ms·
It’s reasonable from the perspective of maximising profit, sure. And it’s true that they’re (as far as I know) consistently applying a rule they set out a long
by atroche 7y ago
It’s reasonable from the perspective of maximising profit, sure. And it’s true that they’re (as far as I know) consistently applying a rule they set out a long time ago.
But that doesn’t make it the right decision, morally. Sometimes rules should be broken.
- ryanlol 7y ago>And it’s true that they’re (as far as I know) consistently applying a rule they set out a long time ago. Have they ever enforced this rule in the past? If not, it's difficult to speak of consistency.
- atroche 7y agoI think it also hinges on whether or not previous players have made “offensive” statements before. If it’s only happened once and they’ve punished it once, I think that’s as consistent as possible. Although of course there’s a lot wriggle room re definition of “offensive”, which muddies the waters.