4 ms·

If the case the GP described is an intended outcome of the law working as designed, I don't think it is a good law.

• diffeomorphism 7y ago
  What is wrong with a) and b)? Remove c) and this sounds like a great intended outcome: "Notice stuff is broken. Notify. Stuff gets fixed".
  • Mirioron 7y ago
    Because the actual outcome isn't that you now have a website that's accessible. The actual outcome is that you now don't have a website at all. I suppose that does mean that everybody has equal accessibility - none.
    • diffeomorphism 7y ago
      That is needlessly black and white and hyperbole. Out of 100 websites you will have now, some of them are currently discriminatory. Some of them will shutdown, some will stop discriminating, some never discriminated to begin with. Instead of going for the hyperbolic "none" put an actual number to it. Is not discriminating worth it if we then only have 99 websites? 95? 50? 20?