> Do you object to “moving” or “forward”? Forward. > Whether you see the world progressing or regressing you might still agree that Stallman is not necessaril

> Do you object to “moving” or “forward”? Forward. > Whether you see the world progressing or regressing you might still agree that Stallman is not necessarily effective in the current climate. This is an amoral (and depraved) approach to this topic. The issue of what constitutes an healthy culture takes precedence over whether an individual is "effective" in that culture. There are many ways to recognize this fact, the simplest being to recognize that humanity's most horrific monsters (Hitler, Stalin, Mao) were highly "effective" leaders in their respective monstrous cultures.