Code review, IMO, is specific to an org and how it wants the culture and codebase to mature overtime. Careless, quick reviews are going to foster an environmen

Code review, IMO, is specific to an org and how it wants the culture and codebase to mature overtime. Careless, quick reviews are going to foster an environment where PR authors do not feel adequately supported where as pedantic, nit-picking reviews are going to exhaust. As for the semantics, it's often about being idiomatic in the language and adhering to good design, i.e. if some requirement changes -- can this change with it?