4 ms·
Not really. Housing should be more expensive than is is now, both in cities as well as in suburbs. We don’t want growth, we want less growth. High prices will s
by ganitarashid 7y ago
Not really. Housing should be more expensive than is is now, both in cities as well as in suburbs. We don’t want growth, we want less growth. High prices will slow growth which is a good thing for the environment.
- lazyasciiart 7y ago> There will always be more people What are you picturing, government enforced house sharing?
- ganitarashid 7y agoI don’t think anything would have to be enforced. Look at San Francisco or NYC. Most people wouldn’t want to have a family of 3 kids there because it’s too expensive.
- lazyasciiart 7y agoNo - they live in the suburbs of new developments and drive in to work there. Massively, unarguably a worse impact on the environment than building some condos downtown. It's like you think people will say oh well, can't afford San Francisco, I'll move to Detroit!
- ganitarashid 7y agoThat’s true, good point. Then the prices of suburbs and new developments should be raised so high that they’re not worth building or moving to.
- lazyasciiart 7y agoByyyyy.......government enforcement or something?
- lonelappde 7y agoSo you are anti people, not anti housing.
- ganitarashid 7y agoAnti growth is actually pro people