3 ms·
That sounds like a fairly expensive solution. I can see eliminating most/all private car traffic in urban centers, but I think it's not likely that everything
by rootusrootus 7y ago
That sounds like a fairly expensive solution. I can see eliminating most/all private car traffic in urban centers, but I think it's not likely that everything else goes underground.
- zarro 7y agoHigh density and high traffic urban areas would be the first targets obviously.
- isostatic 7y agoRather than build streets underground, in somewhere like Manhattan why not build pedestrian areas on top, with direct building entrance at level 2?
- xhgdvjky 7y agooften the pedestrians don't cause traffic as much as other cars (my perspective as a lay person)
- isostatic 7y agoSure, but this way allows the city to begin again without the angst of trying to ban cars.
- burlesona 7y agoIsn’t this basically what Chicago did? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multilevel_streets_in_Chicago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multilevel_streets_in_Chicag...