3 ms·
I should have fleshed out my comment for sure, was in a bit of a rush! first off I found it interesting to frame R as being presented as an improvement over py
by bllguo 7y ago
I should have fleshed out my comment for sure, was in a bit of a rush!
first off I found it interesting to frame R as being presented as an improvement over python. should be the other way around. python for DS came second, and was supposed to improve over R
anyway I'm not sure i can even begin to discuss your use cases, not having that much relevant experience there. I use R (and python) for general analytics tasks and for building production models. in these more traditional DS environments I strongly believe R is far superior to python for data munging and visualization. When I say this I am comparing data.table (and to a lesser extent, tidyverse) to pandas. I don't even want to get started on everything I hate about pandas. So while we are both "cleaning data" you seem to be talking about a stage before someone like me would even be looking.
- dwrodri 7y agoThe use cases I'm focusing on in the article are definitely less "production-friendly" that what you describe. This article definitely caters more to showing R as a CLI tool than R as an ecosystem. My language must have been ambiguous in the article. I intended to frame R as arriving second because that was my personal experience. My writing philosophy for blog posts is that my personal opinions and experiences should stand out from the technical detail. My reasoning is that even for those who disagree with the personal content will be able to discern for themselves the value of the post.