> it would actually pave way for more morally ignorant engineers to replace them All the more reason why they (the replacement) should be blamed. Obviously, th

> it would actually pave way for more morally ignorant engineers to replace them All the more reason why they (the replacement) should be blamed. Obviously, those who might have refused to comply and were replaced made a moral stand and deserve commendation, not blame. > Maybe those engineers don't quit exactly because they want to hinder such actions by the management. Perhaps. There are a lot of hypothetical scenarios we could construct that might absolve the implementor of blame but this is possible in any scenario where we're not privy to the internal process that culminates in a corporate decision.