4 ms·
I would not call getting rid of these regulations as progressive. They exist to protect the environment and enrich the lives of the residents. We just need bett
by trianglem 7y ago
I would not call getting rid of these regulations as progressive. They exist to protect the environment and enrich the lives of the residents. We just need better, cheaper solutions to construction even if it's something as far fetched as robot labor.
- nardi 7y ago> enrich the lives of the residents Mostly, it’s retaining residents’ property values. By not building any new housing.
- closetohome 7y agoThat's literally Elizabeth Campbell's entire motivation. She doesn't want to have to look at the poors in her neighborhood.
- rjkennedy98 7y agoIt sounds good in theory that "They exist to protect the environment and enrich the lives of the residents". Then I'm reminded that environment protection laws have been used to build larger freeways (because we don't want to have cars idling too long!)