5 ms·

I guess I can no longer use Redis. I mean what can the use case of normal Redis possibly be?

by not_a_cop75 7y ago

kirstenbirgit 7y ago
It works, it's simple, and it's battle tested.
- not_a_cop75 7y ago
  Does anyone not read into the sarcasm? This is the same cliche format stating that x is better than y, in such a manner to supposedly shame people still using y.
  - gtirloni 7y ago
    Nobody is shaming anyone.
    - not_a_cop75 7y ago
      No one is shaming ANYONE? Look around. Who is not shaming the oil and coal industry right now?
      - quickthrower2 7y ago
        There is a guideline on Hacker News (and this would apply to any online conversation): "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
codegeek 7y ago
I upvoted you to get you back up a bit but sarcasm is not an HN thing :) unless you complete it with more details.
- ca6f08f8f8 7y ago
  You're definitely right that sarcasm isn't an HN thing. However I still get seriously worried about the personalities of the programmers here who seem unable to recognise sarcasm.
  - dang 7y ago
    It's not about being unable. Readers here recognize sarcasm, but they also recognize what happens to a web forum where it is allowed to proliferate. That's why https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html asks commenters not to be snarky on HN. Lame internet humor tends to grow like kudzu, and the users who post it underestimate how lame it is, as scott_s pointed out well long ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7609289 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7609289. Sarcasm isn't quite the same but it's related.
    - ca6f08f8f8 7y ago
      Thanks dang. I still have one question though. If what you say is a sufficient explanation, then wouldn't we expect HN users to respond to sarcasm with "Please don't post sarcasm here", or a link to the community guidelines, rather than <response that takes the sarcastic statement at face value>? I do however agree about the kudzu and that it is better to just keep it at zero. The purpose of my two posts here is to better understand the community within which I work, not to argue for HN policy change.
      - dang 7y ago
        I think it's really just a numbers game. Of the thousands of people reading any comment, there's always going to be someone who for whatever reason doesn't interpret it in the obvious way. It's more likely for random reasons (e.g. not paying attention) than somehow characterological (e.g. not getting sarcasm).

I guess I can no longer use Redis. I mean what can the use case of normal Redis possibly be?

kirstenbirgit 7y ago

It works, it's simple, and it's battle tested.

not_a_cop75 7y ago
Does anyone not read into the sarcasm? This is the same cliche format stating that x is better than y, in such a manner to supposedly shame people still using y.
- gtirloni 7y ago
  Nobody is shaming anyone.
  - not_a_cop75 7y ago
    No one is shaming ANYONE? Look around. Who is not shaming the oil and coal industry right now?
    - quickthrower2 7y ago
      There is a guideline on Hacker News (and this would apply to any online conversation): "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

codegeek 7y ago

I upvoted you to get you back up a bit but sarcasm is not an HN thing :) unless you complete it with more details.

ca6f08f8f8 7y ago
You're definitely right that sarcasm isn't an HN thing. However I still get seriously worried about the personalities of the programmers here who seem unable to recognise sarcasm.
- dang 7y ago
  It's not about being unable. Readers here recognize sarcasm, but they also recognize what happens to a web forum where it is allowed to proliferate. That's why https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html asks commenters not to be snarky on HN. Lame internet humor tends to grow like kudzu, and the users who post it underestimate how lame it is, as scott_s pointed out well long ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7609289 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7609289. Sarcasm isn't quite the same but it's related.
  - ca6f08f8f8 7y ago
    Thanks dang. I still have one question though. If what you say is a sufficient explanation, then wouldn't we expect HN users to respond to sarcasm with "Please don't post sarcasm here", or a link to the community guidelines, rather than <response that takes the sarcastic statement at face value>? I do however agree about the kudzu and that it is better to just keep it at zero. The purpose of my two posts here is to better understand the community within which I work, not to argue for HN policy change.
    - dang 7y ago
      I think it's really just a numbers game. Of the thousands of people reading any comment, there's always going to be someone who for whatever reason doesn't interpret it in the obvious way. It's more likely for random reasons (e.g. not paying attention) than somehow characterological (e.g. not getting sarcasm).