3 ms·
Interesting, I thought they had already agreed on a standard a few years ago In any case, Syllabics are a very interesting writing system. I'm planning on doin
by __rvnykk 7y ago
Interesting, I thought they had already agreed on a standard a few years ago
In any case, Syllabics are a very interesting writing system. I'm planning on doing an in-depth video about them at some point, but Tom Scott's introduction is great [1].
There are some major advantages to using Syllabics.
Consider that the languages that use them are polysynthetic, meaning that the 'words' are quite large and encompass a lot of information, and that they mostly use a Consonant-Vowel syllable structure that is perfect for a syllabary, where one character represents both a consonant and its vowel [2], or an abugida, where the consonant is the important part of the character, and the vowel markings are secondary [3]. An alphabet creates large, unruly words. Qaliujaaqpait and Ojibwe also double their vowels to lengthen them, making romanized text very long.
Look at this Ojibwe word for coffee: "makade-mashkiikiiwaaboo", in syllabics, it's the much less unruly "ᒪᑲᑌᒪᔥᑮᑮᐙᐴ".
And Syllabics themselves are amazing, there are different shapes for the consonants, and their rotation determines the vowel sound [4]. Just awesome, and very easy to learn
However, sadly, there are many disadvantages to the awesome system. For one, roman letters are everywhere, there's good software support, there's always going to be a need to know them as the new generation learns English and French. Not to mention rotation-based characters are no good for, say, someone with dyslexia. I'm not shocked at this decision, it was the right call.
First Nations and Inuit languages need standardization, and more importantly, as much literature as possible, to compete. That's hard to do when everyone is writing in a different way.
I'm writing syllabic converter software that should hopefully be more accurate than the current ones online today, if you're interested in helping or learning about it, feel free to send me an email
1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xW4hI_METac https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xW4hI_METac
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllabary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllabary
3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abugida https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abugida
4: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ojibwe_writing_systems#Ojibwe_syllabics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ojibwe_writing_systems#Ojibwe_...
- mc32 7y agoHangul is an interesting hybrid with aspects of syllabary and alphabet and seems to work pretty well. Also lends itself well to typesetting. It’s also nice and compact.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Shorel 7y ago> Not to mention rotation-based characters are no good for, say, someone with dyslexia. Latin has pairs of rotated characters (depending on the font): un, pd