3 ms·
That $2.5M isn't even half of their compensation. Why did you pick the lowest figure in the article to make this argument?
by Someone1234 7y ago
That $2.5M isn't even half of their compensation. Why did you pick the lowest figure in the article to make this argument?
- slg 7y agoSo double it or even triple it. You could redistribute it all among the 20k people impacted and we are till only talking about $20 - $30 per month. That would certainly help people, but it isn't going to by life changing money. CEO pay seems like a constant red herring. If we care about inequality, we are probably better off focusing our attention on our tax system (this story [1] is also on the front page of HN at the moment) which has a much bigger impact than CEO pay. [1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21181664 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21181664
- FireBeyond 7y agoWhy double or triple it? His actual guaranteed package is closer to $68MM[1], which is closer to 20x or 30x. [1] with the potential to hit $250MM.