4 ms·
It was a matter of one party being insufficiently SJWist for another party. SJWism is a continuum, not a binary. I've read elsewhere that if a radical lives l
by zeveb 7y ago
It was a matter of one party being insufficiently SJWist for another party. SJWism is a continuum, not a binary.
I've read elsewhere that if a radical lives long enough he'll eventually be chastised for being insufficiently radical. I don't know if it's true, but I for one will find it hilarious in a decade or two when today's SJWs are having to apologise for deriding the idea of human-animal marriage or for opposing lettuce rights in the backwards years of 2019. Or will, anyway, if I haven't died in a re-education camp by then.
- ryandrake 7y agoI consider myself a 90’s Clinton-era progressive, which means I’m pretty much dead to the 2019-era left. Just like Reagan-era conservatives are unrecognizable to “true conservatives” today. The camps are moving so extremely to each side it’s hard to identify with anyone politically anymore.