3 ms·
No, without additional evidence it’s a terrible argument that could apply to almost anything. Data and experience is better than an “a priori reason” every time
by smogcutter 7y ago
No, without additional evidence it’s a terrible argument that could apply to almost anything. Data and experience is better than an “a priori reason” every time.
Tfa addresses reasons cell phone use may not be as explanatory as we think. If you want to argue against that, great, but bring some evidence. Anything else is just hot air.
- npo9 7y agoThe article did more to argue that distracted driving isn’t the #1 contributor than it did to argue road design is.