> much more likely Maybe but when you go from a very low likelihood to begin with increasing it even 10 fold might not make a practical difference. The point

> much more likely Maybe but when you go from a very low likelihood to begin with increasing it even 10 fold might not make a practical difference. The point was any one of us here can accurately judge content on a handful of topics in our areas of expertise and to a lesser extent in connecting fields. But we can say next to nothing outside of that. Let alone generalize to "all" platforms and "99%" of content. It's not "tech"/"non-tech" but "what I know"/"what I don't know". > interesting insights How would one even realize this if they're an expert web developer reading a blog on astronomy? Every single article on a platform could be either gold or shiny manure and most of us wouldn't really tell the difference unless they solidly overlap with those topics mentioned above.