4 ms·
Using security exploits is non-coercive. Law is coercive. You go to law school to learn how people convince other people to force other people to do things.
by lone_haxx0r 7y ago
Using security exploits is non-coercive. Law is coercive.
You go to law school to learn how people convince other people to force other people to do things.
- crimsonalucard 7y agoWhy people follow law is not part of what you learn in law school. That is an anthropological phenomenon that has to do with culture, society and biology. What you learn in law school is less fundamental and more specific to the system at hand. You learn contracts, property, criminal law, constitutional law, legal methods, civil procerude... torts... You learn the specifics so that the system can be exploited. If you think people who study law have some deep insight on the true nature of civilizations and the rules that humans operate under you are completely wrong. Questions like which system is better? Communism or capitalism? Dictatorship or Democracy? Are not what you study in law school. Remember law school is about security exploits.
- bjourne 7y agoI think you have not studied law.
- ajdlinux 7y agoPutting aside the question of what they do and don't teach in law school - over in my part of the world, where, as is normal in the British Commonwealth, law is normally studied at an undergraduate level, it's fairly standard for law students to double major in the humanities or social sciences, where those questions do indeed get asked from a non-legal and more anthropological and cultural perspective.
- crimsonalucard 7y agoWell double majoring is different right? I'm sure if someone wanted to double major in physics and law they wouldn't be getting the social science part.