4 ms·
>There's no difference in practice either for a sufficiently small dataset. So what happens in practice with unfortunately large datasets? >Yes, Haskell can't
by ukj 7y ago
>There's no difference in practice either for a sufficiently small dataset.
So what happens in practice with unfortunately large datasets?
>Yes, Haskell can't help you escape the limitations of our world — or indeed our hardware — but it doesn't pretend to either
Then what is Haskell's value-proposition when it comes to solving real-world problems?
- yakshaving_jgt 7y ago> So what happens in practice with unfortunately large datasets? You take a different approach. Haskell provides plenty of options. > Then what is Haskell's value-proposition when it comes to solving real-world problems? There are many. You can consult your favourite search engine to learn more.
- ukj 7y ago>You take a different approach. Haskell provides plenty of options. So do other languages. Why is Haskell special in this regard? >There are many. You can consult your favourite search engine to learn more. None that seem to address the problem of diminishing returns.
- yakshaving_jgt 7y ago> So do other languages. Why is Haskell special in this regard? I never suggested other programming languages don’t also have value. Again, if you want to educate yourself further on a specific technology’s benefits, I invite you to make use of a search engine instead of sea-lioning on a technical forum. > None that seem to address the problem of diminishing returns. That’s your opinion. Nobody is forcing you to like Haskell. You are free to just ignore it.