3 ms·
> my $1/month VPS can handle the traffic without a problem, so I see no need to ban or rate limit any IPs, especially since I hate captchas with a passion. I r
by speedplane 7y ago
> my $1/month VPS can handle the traffic without a problem, so I see no need to ban or rate limit any IPs, especially since I hate captchas with a passion.
I run a company that routinely scrapes government run, public domain websites. Sadly, many of these sites come with captchas. We can easily bypass these captchas by paying roughly $1.50/1000 captchas, but when scraping millions of pages a month, these costs become significant.
As far as I can tell, adding a captcha to a site does nothing to prevent bots, it just alters the economics of any business that relies on the data. I understand that bots can potentially slow down servers and cause disruptions for human users, but for the handful of government agencies that actually talk to us, we happily restrict scraping to certain hours of the day or limit overall traffic to a reasonable level. I would go further and happily give the money we're spending on solving captchas back to the government so they can upgrade their servers and make the system better for everyone.
For those that are conducting nefarious activities, captchas likely do nothing. For individuals, they are annoying. For legitimate scraping companies, they are a needless expense. Captchas are pretty obsolete.
- therein 7y ago> adding a captcha to a site does nothing to prevent bots, it just alters the economics of any business that relies on the data Definitely agreed. Recently I have been working on a side-project that makes use of bypassing/placating reCaptcha and it has been trivial and not so costly. If it is accounts you're creating, it simply puts a "reasonable" price on account creation. If it is about scraped content, once again, does the same. However these costs already existed in terms of compute resources and time anyway. Captchas hardly made it any harder.