3 ms·
I understand that, and I don't think websites should be deplatformed just for saying unpopular things. But when a site clearly crosses into blatant criminality
by cirno 7y ago
I understand that, and I don't think websites should be deplatformed just for saying unpopular things.
But when a site clearly crosses into blatant criminality, it's disappointing when everyone who has the power to rein them in (Google with PageRank, CloudFlare with protection, the US government with criminal proceedings) decides to pass the buck on to someone else. It's always someone else's problem, meanwhile people's lives are being ruined and lost.
These sites would not be as highly profitable without CloudFlare's network, so I think it's fair that if someone wants to use CloudFlare, they're aware of what they're supporting when they give CloudFlare their money.
- mendelmaleh 7y agoIf it's "blatant criminality", sue them in court. Deplatforming is literally passing the buck to some other platform.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]