3 ms·
This is exactly my point. The other side looks at you and says you're wrong with equal conviction and their own bevy of justifications. Since you and the other
by Invictus0 7y ago
This is exactly my point. The other side looks at you and says you're wrong with equal conviction and their own bevy of justifications. Since you and the other side can't mutually agree on some set of axioms of worldview, both sides' "facts" just become opinions.
- damnyou 7y agoYes, and at that point the only way out is to: 1. keep the door open for anyone who wishes to change their mind 2. wrest power from everyone else -- workplace by workplace, jurisdiction by jurisdiction, culture by culture. The pro-trans side is true, and sometimes truth has to go to war to win.
- PhasmaFelis 7y agoThe presence of two opposed positions does not imply that they're both equally plausible. For example: one group believes in evolution, another believes God created the Earth out of nothing 6000 years ago. Without a time machine, neither one can categorically prove exactly what happened. But one side has mountains of evidence, and the other has dogma and ideology. There's a lot we don't understand yet about how being trans works, just as there's plenty of gaps in the fossil record that we haven't been able to fill yet. But if you ignore all the evidence we do have in favor of cherry-picking only the isolated studies that might support your position, you're no better than the people who think that the scarcity of transitional fossils refutes evolution.