2 ms·
If the points raised by the OP are nitpicks, then I guess it doesn’t matter to you that the sampled (D’) distribution is very close to some easily definable the
by bjornsing 7y ago
If the points raised by the OP are nitpicks, then I guess it doesn’t matter to you that the sampled (D’) distribution is very close to some easily definable theoretical distribution (D)?
If so I can easily illustrate this “good enough quantum supremacy” in my own home and on a very limited budget. The simple reason is that it is absolutely trivial to set up a physical experiment (quantum or not) where it’s very hard for a computer to sample from the distribution of possible outcomes.
- FartyMcFarter 7y agoBut is your low budget experiment programmable with a known sequence of well defined quantum gates? Can you statistically verify that your distribution is very close to D?
- bjornsing 7y agoI don’t really understand... My claim started with “if so”. Now you’re (if I understood you) asking if I’m willing to make the unconditional claim (without “if so”)? (No. If I was I wouldn’t have used the qualifier “if so”.)