Okay, overturn the case law - state your thesis and advance a novel argument. So far I’ve seen driving:traveling::printing:speech. Not only is that not an arg

Okay, overturn the case law - state your thesis and advance a novel argument. So far I’ve seen driving:traveling::printing:speech. Not only is that not an argument, it conveniently overlooks that we have restrictions on speech today - libel and slander, incitement, etc. What is your thesis? Driving should be completely unconstrained by the state? Why? Or is it that we should have national IDs? Why?