Thanks for taking the time to explain. Hearing about regular use of unusual motions (e.g. suspend the rules) tends to pique my skepticism. From the way you desc

Thanks for taking the time to explain. Hearing about regular use of unusual motions (e.g. suspend the rules) tends to pique my skepticism. From the way you described it, having a special method for deciding the order of voting on endorsements does sound reasonable. Just so many times when I see people complaining about Robert's Rules it's not about the rules themselves but about organization-specific issues or about people being dicks (which can happen regardless of the parliamentary authority used).