I know that "did you not read..." comments are normally (rightly) down-voted, but in this case I think it's a reasonable question. The article makes a number o

I know that "did you not read..." comments are normally (rightly) down-voted, but in this case I think it's a reasonable question. The article makes a number of bold claims, without citing evidence. This is only acceptable because it's a summary of a larger report which _does_ cite evidence, but the presentation of the page doesn't make this as obvious as it could. It would be quite easy to skim-read the post, observe that there are bold un-sourced claims being made, and fail to notice that the full report is available to download.