4 ms·
I would say it's worse. At least Apple uses the same frameworks they want you to use. Of the ones you listed office (word, excel etc.) doesn't use them, they h
by SigmundA 7y ago
I would say it's worse. At least Apple uses the same frameworks they want you to use.
Of the ones you listed office (word, excel etc.) doesn't use them, they have their own framework.
Why should I use UWP if its not good enough for the office team? I want to use what they are using.
- kyberias 7y agoWhy is Office your only reference here? Office also runs on Android. It needs to be more portable. Other references: Visual Studio runs on WPF and many Windows apps are UWP.
- SigmundA 7y agoI use office because that's their biggest money making client application suite. You would think it gets the most UI usability focus of any of their products, so it must mean something when they don't use any of the UI frameworks they push for everbody else. Visual Studio is an interesting one, huge effort to get working on WPF, which needed improvements to WPF for them to use it. Surprise dog fooding your UI framework causes improvements pretty quick. Imagine what WPF would be like if the Office team used it, might be cross platform.