5 ms·
There are hands that make this virtually impossible. In one well-known hand where both his opponents have AKo and Postle goes all in. AKo is a very good hand,
by DavidWoof 7y ago
There are hands that make this virtually impossible. In one well-known hand where both his opponents have AKo and Postle goes all in. AKo is a very good hand, but it's a much worse hand if two people hold it. Even if Postle had magic face-reading abilities that allow him to always discern good and bad hands, it's absurd to claim he can read exact rank and suit from faces.
- vast 7y agoThis argument makes no sense. People throw away quads because they sense something or get scared. By a small fraction cards aren't the winning factor in poker.
- DavidWoof 7y agoWe're talking about pre-flop actions. It's literally impossible to throw away quads pre-flop in hold-em. You may be thinking about a different form of poker.
- vast 7y agoSorry no previous poster talked specifically about pre-flop actions.
- hunter2_ 7y agoMaybe saying "opponents have [2 cards not 5]" indicates pre-flop? The communal cards are often referred to as what someone "has" despite being communal.
- DavidWoof 7y agonp, I was probably sloppy in my description. In the hand, two players hold AKo, there's another deadcard king in a folded hand, and Postle calls a all-in pre-flop with 54o. That's a +EV call, but only because of the exact combination of cards held by multiple players. There's no way a tell can give him this information.
- jimmyvalmer 7y ago> It's literally impossible to throw away quads pre-flop Glad to see someone using "literally" correctly.
- banannaise 7y agoCards aren't the winning factor... only to the extent that the winning factor is figuring out what your opponent's cards are better than they can figure out yours. Knowing them because you're cheating is a pretty effective way to do that!