3 ms·
I don't see how there's much difference, it's like arguing that a library isn't "banning" a book because they refused to carry it in the first place.
by calibas 7y ago
I don't see how there's much difference, it's like arguing that a library isn't "banning" a book because they refused to carry it in the first place.
- gatherhunterer 7y agoThe App Store is not an open, public resource. It is supposed to be curated so not allowing most apps is its purpose.
- xvector 7y agoBecause not being approved is normal for all sorts of apps. This whole controversy was blown out of proportion. If your app is not approved, you just make the changes and resubmit.
- Betelgeuse90 7y agoAssuming changes can be made in order to be approved while still being true to their goal (which is essentially escaping from law enforcement). Apple rejected the app explicitly because of what it was trying to achieve.