I don't think that section invalidates my point. Those borderline-borderline cases can also be dealt with by leaving the call on the field in place. Or not. Wh

I don't think that section invalidates my point. Those borderline-borderline cases can also be dealt with by leaving the call on the field in place. Or not. What I'm saying is that video review doesn't make the judgements worse. It either illustrates the vagueness, or discovers a concrete fact that was missed during live action judgements. Just because video review can't solve the Sorites Paradox (or any of the meta-paradoxes at the margins of the excluded middle), doesn't mean that it's useless. What replay review does do is mitigate the fallibility of human judges seeing the action from limited angles in real time.