3 ms·
There is a mile-wide difference in acceptable behavior endorsed "from the top down" in each system. The US, for all of its faults, attempts to reign in immoral
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
There is a mile-wide difference in acceptable behavior endorsed "from the top down" in each system.
The US, for all of its faults, attempts to reign in immoral and counter-productive behavior within its sphere of influence. Iran is a net-exporter of terrorism (methodologies, material, and financial support). And I am keeping it very civil in my description of the differences.
By posing the question "[...] why should Iran doing it be a big problem?", I view you as purposely being disingenuous. You know why. The Iranian political leadership is a clear problem.
To be clear about my words: The Iranian people are NOT the problem. The Iranian leadership is the problem. The Iranian people are pawns on the chess-board between the US and Iran. They are the group I feel the most sadness for in terms of who is paying the biggest cost.
- boomboomsubban 7y ago>The US, for all of its faults, attempts to reign in immoral and counter-productive behavior within its sphere of influence. Iran is a net-exporter of terrorism (methodologies, material, and financial support How is exporting billions in arms to Saudi Arabia and assisting them in continuing the Yemen war/blockade attempting to reign in immoral behavior? Why is Iran's "exporting terrorism" so much worse despite killing far fewer civilians? >I view you as purposely being disingenuous. Nope. A moral high ground should not enable a country to interfere in foreign elections, nor does the US have such a moral high ground.