> requires that we have safe nuclear storage facilities for the next 10,000 years or so Not really, no. You should take a look at how many people die due to c

> requires that we have safe nuclear storage facilities for the next 10,000 years or so Not really, no. You should take a look at how many people die due to coal, and how much long term environmental damage coal is responsible for. Even in the worst case scenario of a Nuclear Accident, I would still rather that happen, than deal with the effects of coal.