> Hell, actually require you to wear a device at all times so all conversations can be recorded. The government could similarly demand backdoors into people's

> Hell, actually require you to wear a device at all times so all conversations can be recorded. The government could similarly demand backdoors into people's private devices, so people can be listened to and their usage of the device recorded, in case they might be up to no good. I see essentially no moral difference between banning E2EE and banning security of devices. If you have no right to communicate secretly with a person, why should you have any right to communicate secretly with a possession?