4 ms·
I don't disagree that many groups could get closer to consensus with better meeting management, but in practice building consensus is often an illusion. I've b
by dev_tty01 7y ago
I don't disagree that many groups could get closer to consensus with better meeting management, but in practice building consensus is often an illusion. I've been in organizations where building consensus meant continuing to meet and rehash until the minority group got sick of meeting and stopped arguing. Then we voted and the majority ruled, but there was still no consensus. Massive waste of time. Make your case succinctly, vote, and move on. You win some and you lose some.
Problems arise when the minority opinion members can't recognize the possibility that they were perhaps wrong or perhaps not seeing the complete picture. No truly productive debate can ever occur unless both sides are willing to recognize the very real possibility that they are wrong or at least that there are often multiple reasonable ways to solve a problem.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- bluGill 7y agoWhy is it only the minority that needs to recognize they might be wrong? Sometimes the majority is wrong.
- tengbretson 7y agoBecause the majority opinion is set to actually be implemented, so it will be obvious to everyone whether or not it is wrong.
- jeegsy 7y agoQuite right. As the article notes, a key part of Robert was that everyone agreed to the rules. This says nothing about whether or not there will be total agreement with outcomes. To pretend that so called "consensus" building will be the magic pill for disagreement is foolhardy.