9 ms·
Can they spell "anti-trust violation"?
by stefan_ 7y ago
Can they spell "anti-trust violation"?
- logfromblammo 7y agoThey don't need to; they already know how to buy congressfolk.
- journalctl 7y agoYou don’t even need to buy them anymore. The current Senate would block anti-puppy murdering legislation if it suited their agenda. I mean, truly, I have no faith that any sensible regulation for this would make it through Congress. It’s inconceivable, and that’s sad.
- jimbob45 7y agoOn the other hand, we don't allow radical legislation to go through and that's a huge positive in some cases. We would never let a Brexit/secession go through because we'd never be able to agree on it.
- scarface74 7y agoTangent: Why do we value dogs and cats more than pigs and cows?
- rapsey 7y agoHow many politicians have the balls to go after Disney? Not many.
- jfengel 7y agoI don't see the trust issue here. Indeed, upthread I saw somebody complaining about there being too many services, which would seem to be the opposite of a monopoly (to my not-legally-trained mind).
- heisenbit 7y agoGood point if they had a dominant market position. According to https://csimarket.com/stocks/competitionSEG2.php?code=DIS https://csimarket.com/stocks/competitionSEG2.php?code=DIS their share is around 10% which I don't thinks qualifies as dominant.