4 ms·
I really don’t grok your question. Indiscriminate (“unreasonable”) use, without a warrant, is unconstitutional.
by kylek 7y ago
I really don’t grok your question. Indiscriminate (“unreasonable”) use, without a warrant, is unconstitutional.
- dragonwriter 7y agoThe 4th Amendment both implicitly creates (or, rather, assumes) a general warrant requirement (for which it sets a probable cause requirement) and bans unreasonable searches and seizures; it doesn't allow warrants for unreasonable use.
- criddell 7y agoSo as long as the same legal hurdles are in place, you don't have a problem with Facebook (for example) being required to provide law enforcement with access to unencrypted comms?
- kylek 7y agoDon’t put words in my mouth. Your example is not the same thing to me.
- criddell 7y agoI didn't intend to put words in your mouth. I'm trying to understand the difference between a conversation over Facebook and a conversation on a telephone. Legally they are treated differently and I don't see why that should be.