4 ms·
Curious why you would remove moderator status from Monica? From my understanding it appears that she was demoted for merely posing relevant questions. As I do
by kjaftaedi 7y ago
Curious why you would remove moderator status from Monica?
From my understanding it appears that she was demoted for merely posing relevant questions.
As I don't believe SE has even made any specific claims backing up their decision, I'm curious as to why you suggest this is the correct decision to make.
- sam_lowry_ 7y agoTo send the message to other users and moderators that such discussions are unwelcome. SE has to balance between the need to expand into topics like judaism.stackexchange.com and islam.stackechange.com while remaining a q&a business, not a flamebait-generator business.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- ryan-allen 7y agoThey may need to apply separate CoC's to different SE's. You can't have bona fide Religious SE's and the compelled use of personal pronouns co-exist. If they think otherwise they are delusional, one will end up waging the other, and dogs only have one tail.
- stefan_ 7y agoI think they should remove many many more moderators, for no reason other than not doing so risks turning their site and resource into a Wikipedia 2.0, a place where cliquey moderators hang out to discuss their favorite flame bait topics all day, populate gigabytes of meta pages and lash out at unwitting, novel contributors. Wikipedia think a lack of a fancy SPA editor is the reason behind their editor demographics, and they couldn't be further from the truth. Ideally start with just straight up removing half the current moderators. Pick at random.
- MauranKilom 7y agoCan you briefly describe what you believe moderator duties on SE currently entail? I have reason to believe that there is a misunderstanding.
- wincy 7y agoThe Thanos plan for fixing StackExchange, really?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]