> Wouldn't a mass surveillance system force people to never go outside, by fear of unintentionally breaking the law and get caught ? I find it more likely that

> Wouldn't a mass surveillance system force people to never go outside, by fear of unintentionally breaking the law and get caught ? I find it more likely that enforcement would be relatively rare, and selective. Rare so that people still go outside. Selective in a way that marginalizes anyone who gets in the way of the people in charge. After all, they'll be able to find a record of criminal activity for anyone.