NYT great example. Note how they dont source the claim. The reader is not expected to even wonder if there is a source. It's worded as if the sentence itself is

NYT great example. Note how they dont source the claim. The reader is not expected to even wonder if there is a source. It's worded as if the sentence itself is the source. A curious reader would need to contact Kenneth Vogel directly. If history is a guide, the response it something about "backgound sources with information about the matter". Or start searching archives for Shokin. It's common to use hit pieces to attack people problems. Again though, consider that claim in context with the first hand account from the person that got fired: https://i.redd.it/wp66quhos4p31.jpg https://i.redd.it/wp66quhos4p31.jpg Who is Joe Biden's son? Why would that company hire him? And what is the NTY? IMO thinking of it as a newspaper is like thinking of Google as a search engine: https://i.imgur.com/VUdcIou.jpg https://i.imgur.com/VUdcIou.jpg https://gawker.com/here-are-some-top-n-y-times-editors-and-staff-joking-a-1713336525 https://gawker.com/here-are-some-top-n-y-times-editors-and-s...