> I'm not entirely sure how those four examples are supposedly invalidated by giving them a clever nickname. It's not supposed to invalidate the reality of th

> I'm not entirely sure how those four examples are supposedly invalidated by giving them a clever nickname. It's not supposed to invalidate the reality of the matters concerned. It's supposed to suggest that that they're not actually the issues at hand, with CP and Drugs and Terrorism being used as stalking horses because being in a position of being seen to defend the privacy rights of terrorists makes for terrible PR.