That is indeed a lazy argument. The proper angle for the public argument is what's the tradeoff? What do you lose by trading privacy?(as you're clearly not imp

That is indeed a lazy argument. The proper angle for the public argument is what's the tradeoff? What do you lose by trading privacy?(as you're clearly not impacting child safety by dropping privacy related to a digital asset). And second: is encryption the number one fix for the actual concern? - i.e. if (physical) child safety is the most important concern for you (the citizen) what has the largest impact on that?